Article Sidebar
Introduction
Orchids are one of the most diverse and widespread families of flowering plants, with approximately 28,500 species, and are classified among the most threatened plant groups worldwide (Indan et al. 2021, Štípková et al. 2021). Orchids are facing a rapid decline in their population worldwide; therefore, it is among the main species with respect to plant protection (Yi-Bo et al. 2003, Tikendra et al. 2021). Although a single orchid produces thousands of seeds during the breeding season, very few seeds survive as adult plants and the germination of seeds depends on the presence of compatible fungi in the soil and optimal microclimate and micro-edaphic conditions (Nicole et al. 2005, Jacquemyn et al, 2010, Cardoso et al. 2020, Phillips et al. 2020).
The density of fungi in the distribution area of the orchid affects the germination rate of seeds (Jacquemyn et al. 2012). Habitat destruction due to global climate change, urbanization, agricultural purposes, environmental pollution, and over-collection for food and medical purposes threaten the existence of orchids (Rasmussen 1995, Sezik 2002). Orchids with their very different life types, specific pollinators, and mycorrhizal associations are very interesting plants and the focus of interest for scientists from different research disciplines (Rasmussen 1995, Yi-Bo et al. 2003).
Terrestrial orchids (temperate) are mostly distributed in Eurasian-Mediterranean regions and most of them have tubers under the soil. Glucomannan, a starch-like polymer found in these tubers, is an important food additive (Sezik 2002, Hossain 2011). Especially in Greece, Iran, and Turkey, the use of orchids as a food additive is the most important factor threatening their extinction (Sezik 2002, Ghorbani et al. 2014). Against these threats, seedling production by in vitro and ex vitro symbiotic seed germination with compatible fungi seems to be a very favourable method for the propagation and reintroduction success of temperate orchids (Aewsakul et al. 2013, Mutlu and Kömpe 2021, Deniz et al. 2022). It has been determined that the adaptation success of healthy and strong seedlings to the natural environment is quite high (Deniz et al. 2022). It has also been shown that rich media and substrates for strong seedlings are effective in symbiotic reproduction (Aewsakul et al. 2013).
Anacamptis laxiflora is an orchid distributed in wetlands and at altitudes up to 1600 m above sea level in the Mediterranean countries of Western Asia, and Central and Southern Europe (Wood and Ramsay 2004). A. laxiflora, attracts attention due to its specific wetland habitats, which are becoming gradually reduced, making the species more vulnerable to extinction threat (Kömpe et al. 2020). These orchids with showy flowers and large tubers are one of the most collected species for the well-sought-after hot beverage, salep (Sezik 2002). One individual with loose flowers and the pollination of all of these flowers produces hundreds of thousands of seeds (Wood and Ramsay 2004). Some research has been conducted on the propagation of this species through in vitro, symbiotic and asymbiotic germination (Özkoç and Dalci 1993, Kömpe et al. 2020). The most important goal in both commercial and conservation studies is to produce healthy and strong seedlings that are easily adapted to the natural environment. It has been determined that healthy seedlings obtained with compatible fungus under in vitro and ex vitro conditions can easily adapt to nature (Kömpe et al. 2020, Deniz et al. 2022). The success of symbiotic germination is strongly dependent on the compatible fungus as well as the additives added to the nutrient medium. This is because the symbiotic fungus transports carbon and other nutrients from the nutrient medium to the embryo. The presence of suitable substrates in the germination medium positively affects germination and seedling rate (Aewsakul et al. 2013). In addition, ex vitro symbiotic germination seems to be a practical and effective method by which to obtain strong seedlings in a short time and in simpler environments, as well as to ensure easier adaptation to nature (Aewsakul et al. 2013, Kömpe and Mutlu 2021, Deniz et al. 2022, Kömpe et al. 2022). In this context, the aim of this study is to determine the effect of different organic substrates added to a modified oat medium (Clements et al. 1986), which is used as an effective in vitro symbiotic culture medium, for the germination of Anacamptis laxiflora(Lam.) seeds and to demonstrate that the most effective substrate can be used as an ex vitro orchid propagation medium.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Seeds of Anacamptis laxiflora, which is commonly found in wet meadows in Samsun (Turkey), were collected in July 2017. The mature capsules were taken, opened in the laboratory, dried for a few days at room temperature, and then stored at 4 °C in brown glass bottles.
Fungal isolate
In this study, we used Ceratobasidium sp. (NCBI-accession number is MT605389) from the roots of A. laxiflora from previous research (Kömpe et al. 2020). The isolate is kept in the orchid-fungi collection of the Department of Biology at the University of Ondokuz Mayıs. A piece of the stock culture of this fungal isolate was taken and transferred to Petri dishes containing the fungus isolation medium (Clements et al. 1986) and the Petri dishes were wrapped with aluminium foil. They were incubated at 25 °C in the dark until the fungal hyphae completely covered the dishes. Fungus activation procedures were performed under sterile conditions and with sterile equipment throughout the entire study.
In vitro symbiotic seed germination
Modified oat medium (MOM) was used as a positive control in the symbiotic seed germination method (Clements et al. 1986). MOM contains Ca(NO3)2 × 2 H2O (0.2 g), KH2PO4 (0.2 g), KCl (0.1 g), MgSO4 × 7 H2O (0.1 g), yeast extract (0.1 g), agar (10 g), ground oat (3.5 g) and sucrose (2 g) per litre and the pH is 5.8. Inorganic substances used for this medium were obtained from Merck (USA), and yeast extract and agar were obtained from Sigma.
Instead of ground oats, the same amounts (3.5 g L-1) of ground old hazelnut leaves, young hazelnut leaves, straw, old oak leaves and young oak leaves, with sucrose (2 g L-1) or without it, were added in the MOM. As young leaves, we used spring leaves and dried them in an oven at 40 °C. For old leaves we used dry brown leaves collected directly from the trees in autumn which were then dehumidified at 40 °C. These substrates were ground separately and added to each medium.
The medium prepared as above and adjusted to pH 5.8 was sterilized in an autoclave at 121 °C for 15 minutes and then poured evenly into Petri dishes in sterile laminar flow. After the MOM in the Petri dishes solidified, they were used for germination tests. In addition, MOM without sucrose and fungi were prepared as a negative control. All substrates added to MOM in this study and their modifications are given in Tab. 1.
Tab. 1. Characteristics of substrates tested for germination of Anacamptis laxiflora seeds.
| Substrates | Abbreviations |
| Modified oat medium + fungus | MOM |
| Modified oat medium + fungus (no sucrose) | MOM (-S) |
| Modified oat medium (no fungus) | MOM (-F) |
| Modified oat medium (no sucrose and fungus) | MOM (-S and -F) |
| Old hazelnut leaf medium + sucrose+ fungus | OHL |
| Old hazelnut leaf medium + fungus (no sucrose) | OHL (-S) |
| Old oak leaf medium + sucrose + fungus | OOL |
| Old oak leaf medium + fungus (no sucrose) | OOL (-S) |
| Straw medium + sucrose + fungus | S |
| Straw medium + fungus (no sucrose) | S (-S) |
| Young hazelnut leaf medium + sucrose+ fungus | YHL |
| Young hazelnut leaf medium + fungus (no sucrose) | YHL (-S) |
| Young hazelnut leaf + fungus – ex vitro | YHL-EV |
| Young hazelnut leaf (no fungi) – ex vitro | YHL-EV (-F) |
| Young oak leaf medium +sucrose+ fungus | YOL |
| Young oak leaf medium + fungus (no sucrose) | YOL (-S) |
The seeds were disinfected by immersion in 1% (v/v) solution of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) plus 0.1% (v/v) of Tween 20, followed by six rinses with distilled, autoclaved water. Seeds (approximately 100-150) were sown with a sterilized inoculation loop in Petri dishes (diameter 9 mm) containing the organic substrates tested in the study and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C in the dark for a week. Then, an agar block (approx. 0.5 - 7 mm2) containing fungal hyphae was taken from a Petri plate containing the fungal isolate and put next to the seeds. Each application was repeated three times. All treatments were cultivated in a tissue culture chamber under 16:8 hours (light/dark) conditions at 25 ± 2 °C for 8 weeks.
Ex vitro symbiotic seed germination
After determining that the most effective substrate for total germination and seedling growth in in vitro conditions was young hazelnut leaves, this substrate was also used in ex vitro germination medium. Young hazelnut leaves were collected from a hazelnut orchard in Samsun/Turkey during spring (April-May), dried at 40 °C in an oven, ground, and then sterilized in an autoclave at 121°C for 20 minutes before being placed into pots. Approximately 200-250 seeds were placed between sheets of water-resistant nylon mesh (45 μm pore size) and fixed between the dia frame (Rasmussen and Whigham 1993). Six seed packets were buried in each pot, and the pots were filled with equal amounts of young hazelnut leaves. In three pots, eight 1 cm2 agar blocks containing fungal hyphae were placed around the seed packets, while the other pots were kept as a control group without any fungal inoculation. The pots were incubated under 16:8 hours (light/dark) conditions at 25 ± 2 °C in a climate chamber. Pots were irrigated once a week with a sterilized solution containing MOM's minerals and sucrose (1/2 strength).
Germination parameters
Three germination parameters were examined during 28 days to find out the potential effect of different substrates on seed germination of A. laxiflora. The observations were recorded daily for seeds.
Germination percentage was calculated according to Elezz et al. (2019), while germination index and mean germination time according to Marvin and Gonzales (2015):
Figure 1.
During seed germination, development was also monitored and described according to the following stages: S0 - no germination, S1 - swollen embryo with rupture of the seed coat, S2 - rupture of testa, globular embryo, rhizoids present (germination), S3 - protocorm formation, S4 - formation of first leaf and S5 - elongation of the first leaf and rooted (Zettler and Hofer 1998, Johnson et al. 2007). Stage 3 was considered the beginning of germination.
Data analysis
Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and mean values were compared by Duncan's multiple range test (DMTR), α = 0.05) using IBM SPSS Statistics 24.
Results
Anacamptis laxiflora seeds germination
In order to evaluate the germination parameters, the germination status of the seeds in all culture media was checked daily from seed sowing. Germination started within 4 weeks of seed sowing and germination parameters were evaluated for the next 4 weeks (Tab. 2).
Tab. 2. The effects of different organic substrates (see Tab. 1. for abbreviation explanation), with or without sucrose (-S) on symbiotic seed germination of Anacamptis laxiflora. The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, n = 3. One-way ANOVA and the post- hoc Duncan multiple range test was used to analyse differences between means. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Means followed with the same letters denote that there was no statistically significant difference between groups.
| Substrates | Germination index (GI) | Mean germination time (MGT) | Germination rate (GR) (%) |
| MOM | 0.6 ± 0.4d | 18.3 ± 4.7ab | 15.60 ± 6.87cd |
| MOM (-S) | 0.9 ± 0.1d | 20.1 ± 2.7ab | 14.42 ± 3.04d |
| MOM (-F) | 0.0 ± 0.0d | 0.0 ± 0.0d | 0.0 ± 0.0e |
| MOM (-S and -F) | 0.0 ± 0.0d | 0.0 ± 0.0d | 0.0 ± 0.0e |
| OHL | 3.4 ± 1.5a | 13.7 ± 3.6bc | 31.16 ± 9.73ab |
| OHL (-S) | 2.7 ± 1.4ab | 13.6 ± 8.3bc | 30.85 ± 5.67ab |
| OOL | 1.3 ± 0.4bcd | 22.1 ± 4.3a | 24.95 ± 5.90bc |
| OOL (-S) | 0.7 ± 0.4d | 18.5 ± 1.1ab | 15.87 ± 5.41cd |
| S | 1.3 ± 0.9bcd | 19.4 ± 4.1ab | 24.13 ± 0.99bc |
| S (-S) | 0.9 ± 0.2cd | 19.4 ± 1.6ab | 24.87 ± 6.12bc |
| YHL | 2.6 ± 1.9abc | 18.7 ± 2.3ab | 35.78 ± 10.43a |
| YHL (-S) | 0.7 ± 0.1d | 18.4 ± 3.8ab | 11.65 ± 1.11d |
| YOL | 0.7 ± 0.1d | 17.7 ± 1.9ab | 14.40 ± 2.35d |
| YOL (-S) | 0.5 ± 0.4d | 7.9 ± 2.3c | 9.54 ± 3.00d |
| YHL-EV | 3.4 ± 1.21a | 12.3 ± 0.5ab | 19.01 ± 4.15cd |
| YHL-EV (-F) | 0.0 ± 0.0d | 0.0 ± 0.0d | 0.0 ± 0.0e |
The effects of sucrose in combination with oat and other substrates on symbiotic germination and seedling development of A.laxiflorawere firstly tested in invitroconditions. MOM basic medium and its modifications, namely sucrose-free (MOM (-S)), fungus-free (MOM (-F)), and both sucrose- and fungus-free (MOM (-S and-F)), were used as control groups. No germination was observed in fungus-free substrates, including MOM (-F) and MOM (-S and-F), and consequently, data related to germination index (GI), germination rate (GR), and mean germination time (MGT) could not be obtained (Tab. 2). The highest GI values (Tab. 2) was achieved in YHL and OHL substrates (Tab.1) and were significantly higher than that in MOM (Tab. 2). Other sucrose-containing substrates gave similar results to MOM. In the groups without sucrose, the lowest GI (Tab. 2) was observed in MOM (-S), OOL (-S), YOL (-S), and YHL (-S) substrates (Tab. 1).
The YHL substrate has been found to have the highest germination rate (GR) among all tested substrates in vitro (Tab. 2). It exhibited a germination rate three times as high as YHL (-S). Among other sucrose-containing media, including MOM, OHL had a significantly higher GR value. Among the sucrose-free substrates, MOM (-S), YHL (-S), and YOL (-S) were found to have lower GR rates. In contrast, OHL (-S) had the highest GR rate among the sucrose-free group, which was twice that of MOM (-S) (Tab. 2).
Regarding the mean germination time (MGT), sucrose-containing substrates in vitro exhibited the highest and lowest values in OOL and OHL media, respectively. However, there were no significant differences from MOM. Among the sucrose-free substrates, MOM (-S) had the highest MGT, and the lowest MGT (Tab. 2) was observed in YOL (-S) substrate, which was significantly different from the value observed in the same medium with sucrose.
Since under in vitro conditions, YHL had the highest GR and GI, it was used as the substrate for the exvitroexperiment. GI obtained in exvitroconditions was slightly better than in in vitro conditions. However, GR was found to be approximately half of that in the in vitro and MGT was also slightly lower.
The developmental process of Anacamptis laxiflora
From the data collected for the germination of A. laxiflora seeds in the different treatments, the developmental stages were assigned to a qualitative scale, according to a modification from Zettler and Hofer (1998), and Johnson et al. (2007).
The effect of substrates added instead of oat in the modified medium on seedling development in the presence and absence of sucrose is shown in Tab. 3. Seedling growth was evaluated 8 weeks after seed sowing. According to the results, leafy seedlings (stage 5) were formed at different percentages in all in vitro substrate modifications as well as in ex vitro condition (FHL-EV). No growth was observed in the control groups without fungal inoculation (MOM (-F), MOM (-S and -F)).
Tab. 3. Effects of substrates and mycorrhizal inoculation on the developmental stages of seeds of Anacamptis laxiflora at 8 weeks after seed sowing. Development of the seedlings was divided into stages: S0 - no germination, S1 - swollen embryo with rupture of the seed coat, S2 - rupture of testa, globular embryo, rhizoids present (germination), S3 - protocorm formation, S4 - formation of first leaf; S5 - rooted and leafy plantlet. The effects of substrates and their sucrose-free modifications on developmental stages were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Results were compared using the standard deviation of the means (n = 3) and the post-hoc Duncan multiple range test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. There is no statistically significant difference between groups with the same letters.
| Substrates | Development stages % | |||||
| S0 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | |
| MOM | 77.64 ± 5.2abcd | 6.77 ± 2.1ef | 4.15 ± 1.2abc | 3.14 ± 1.7bcde | 4.15 ± 2.2abcd | 4.15 ± 2.2cde |
| MOM (-S) | 72.30 ± 3.8bcdef | 13.28 ± 4.8bcd | 3.34 ± 1.5bcd | 2.91 ± 1.1bcde | 1.66 ± 0.8de | 6.50 ± 2.0bcd |
| MOM (-F) | 82.10 ± 3.5ab | 17.90 ± 2.42b | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e |
| MOM (-S, -F) | 72.41 ± 5.9bcdef | 27.59 ± 5.9a | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e |
| OHL | 65.57 ± 9.3ef | 3.27 ± 1.3f | 5.21 ± 1.8ab | 7.37 ± 4.9ab | 3.84 ± 0.5abcd | 14.73 ± 3.5a |
| OHL (-S) | 63.27 ± 7.5fg | 5.88 ± 2.3ef | 4.52 ± 2.2abc | 6.13 ± 3.8abcd | 5.05 ± 2.4ab | 15.16 ± 3.3a |
| OOL | 67.76 ± 3.6def | 7.30 ± 2.3def | 3.42 ± 0.5bcd | 7.28 ± 1.8ab | 4.93 ± 2.1abc | 9.32 ± 2.4b |
| OOL (-S) | 78.52 ± 2.0abcd | 5.62 ± 3.3ef | 3.27 ± 1.2bcd | 3.31 ± 1.3bcde | 3.67 ± 1.8abcd | 5.62 ± 1.9bcd |
| S | 70.09 ± 2.8cdef | 5.78 ± 2.4ef | 3.14 ± 1.3bcd | 6.99 ± 1.4abc | 6.13 ± 2.6a | 7.87 ± 2.6bc |
| S (-S) | 67.72 ± 6.5def | 7.41 ± 2.8def | 4.83 ± 0.8ab | 7.47 ± 4.6ab | 3.34 ± 0.5bcd | 9.23 ± 1.6b |
| YHL | 55.47 ± 12.0g | 8.75 ± 2.1def | 6.81 ± 3.5a | 9.04 ± 5.1a | 4.88 ± 1.0abc | 15.05 ± 4.3a |
| YHL (-S) | 82.04 ± 3.5ab | 6.31 ± 2.5ef | 1.55 ± 0.3cde | 2.21 ± 0.3cde | 3.84 ± 0.5abcd | 4.05 ± 0.9cde |
| YOL | 74 .50 ± 5.3abcde | 11.11 ± 5.2cde | 3.20 ± 1.9bcd | 4.14 ± 1.8bcde | 2.31 ± 0.8cde | 4.74 ± 0.7cd |
| YOL (-S) | 79.26 ± 3.abc | 11.20 ± 3.8cde | 1.72 ± 0.2cde | 2.05 ± 0.7de | 2.88 ± 1.1bcd | 2.88 ± 1.1de |
| YHL-EV | 78.07 ± 3.2abcd | 2.93 ± 1.3f | 0.98 ± 0.44de | 1.60 ± 1.18de | 1.56 ± 0.52de | 14.87 ± 3.88a |
| YHL-EV (-F) | 83.71 ± 4.8a | 16.29 ± 4.8bc | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e | 0.0 ± 0.0e |
The highest percentage of protocorm formation (S3) was observed in the YHL substrate (Fig. 1A) and it was approximately three times higher than in MOM. Results on other substrates showed no difference from those obtained with MOM. The protocorm formation in substrates that did not contain sucrose were similar to that obtained for substrates with sucrose except for YHL (-S) where significantly lower protocorm formation was observed (Tab. 3).
Figure 2.
Fig. 1. Protocorm and progression of seedling development of Anacamptis laxiflora cultured on YHL medium. A) Stage 2 - protocorms and stage 3 - leaf primordium (arrows 1 and 2 show protocorm and leaf primordium, respectively), B) Stage 4 - leafy seedlings, C) Stage 5 – rooted and leafy seedlings. Scale bars: A - 1 mm, B and C - 1 cm.
The highest percentage of first leaf formation stage (S4) was observed in the straw (S) substrate with sucrose, while the OHL (-S) had the highest value among the sucrose-free modifications. The lowest percentage was in MOM (-S) under in vitro conditions.
The highest percentage of seedlings with roots and leaves (S5) was observed in the YHL substrate (Fig. 1C), which was approximately 3.5 times higher than that of MOM. OHL and OOL media had also significantly higher values than MOM. The lowest percentage in sucrose-containing substrates was observed in the YOL, following MOM. In sucrose-free substrates, the best percentage was observed in OHL (-S) which was similar to the value observed for OHL and more than twice that of MOM (-S). The lowest percentage was in the YOL (-S) medium.
Regarding ex vitro conditions, although the germination rate in YHL medium was lower than that in the in vitro medium containing the same substrate, there was an interestingly high percentage of seedlings in the S5 stage (Fig. 2C), with a value similar to that for YHL in vitro. Moreover, the seedlings successfully survived transfer to nature (Fig. 2D).
Figure 3.
Fig.2. Anacamptis laxiflora. A) Protocorms that developed 28 days after the seed packs were embedded in the fresh hazelnut leaf, B) the seedlings five weeks later, C) the seedlings with root that developed eight weeks later, D) transplanted seedlings in nature. Scale bar: A – 1 mm; B, C and D – 1 cm.
Discussion
Orchids are in danger of extinction because of habitat destruction, over-harvesting, and the lack of a suitable fungus for seed germination. In situ and ex situ conservation methods are recommended for the protection of orchids. However, ex situ protection is also insufficient due to the rapid destruction and disappearance of habitats and the vulnerability of the specific habitats they are found in (Batty et al. 2006, Lemay et al. 2015, Štípková et al. 2021). Seed banks are also included in conservation programs, as it is known that orchid seeds can maintain their viability for many years (Kömpe et al. 2020). However, as this longevity is limited seed banks may not be a long-term solution. In recent years, it has been accepted that the most effective protection method is to transfer asymbiotic and/or symbiotic seedlings to the natural environment to establish a population (Smith et al. 2010, Duncan and Moloney 2018, Soares et al. 2020, Kömpe and Mutlu 2021, Wang et al. 2021, Zhao et al. 2021). The success of asymbiotic and symbiotic methods varies according to the orchid species, the nutrient media used, and the appropriate fungus (Rasmussen 1995). A. laxiflora is a wet meadow orchid found throughout Central Europe and the Mediterranean, including Turkey. There are some studies in which symbiotic and asymbiotic methods are applied to germinate seeds of this species (Mead and Bulard 1975, 1979, Özkoç and Dalcı 1993, Deconninck and Gerakis 2021, Kömpe et al. 2020). However, these studies mostly remained within the laboratory limits.
In this research, first, the efficiency of various organic substrates and sucrose on symbiotic seed germination and seedling growth was determined in vitro. Then ex vitro symbiotic germination was performed on the most effective substrate.
It is known that the basic functions of compatible fungi effective in the germination process of orchid seeds in nature are to carry carbon, nitrogen, and some other basic nutrients to the embryo (Jacquemyn et al. 2012). Detailed studies on the effect of carbon sources in invitroreplication studies were also conducted (Hadley and Perombel 1963, Smith 1966, Yam and Arditti 2009, Mehra et al. 2017). In addition to soluble carbon sources (such as monosaccharides, disaccharides, and polysaccharides), the effects of various organic substrates (milled oats, rotted leaves, cockroaches, peat moss, etc.) were also tested and different effects emerged (Mala et al. 2017). It was found that a compatible fungus and symbiotic method and substrates such as oat and peat moss were more effective in the germination of seeds of tropical exotic orchids (Mala et al. 2017). Orchid seeds do not contain endosperm, so they need all essential nutrients, especially carbon, to be transported by fungi until the photosynthetic stage. This occurs more abundantly and faster in the presence of rich substrates. Although the effect of hazelnut leaves has not been tested on the germination of any orchid seed before, Mala et al. (2017) suggested that natural substrates can be more effective in the development of symbiotic seedlings than oat in MOM.
In our study, it was revealed that different natural substrates significantly promoted germination and seedling development, and that sucrose increased this stimulation. This is not surprising since sucrose is a carbon source that plant cells use until the photosynthetic stage is established. The use of sucrose as a carbon source in the culture medium has been shown to be very important in orchid seed germination and protocorm development for both mature and immature seeds (Arditti 1967, Rasmussen et al. 2015, Gupta 2016).
Reintroduction studies have shown that if the transferred seedlings are well developed, the success and continuity of survival in nature are also higher (Aewsakul et al. 2013; Kömpe et al. 2022; Deniz et al. 2022). Therefore, in this study we performed an exvitroexperiment with the substrate that proved the most effective in order to obtain strong seedlings for reintroduction under ex vitro symbiotic conditions. Ex vitro symbiotic propagation studies conducted so far using different substrates have revealed very remarkable results. The ex vitro symbiotic method was first applied by Quay et al. (1995). These researchers inoculated fungi into a mulch obtained from Allocasuarina fraseriana trees. Although the germination rate was low, this was pioneering research for ex vitro germination (Quay et al. 1995). Aewsakul et al. (2013) inoculated two Epulorhiza isolates (isolated from Dendrobium anosmum and Paphiopedilum sukhakulii) onto different substrates (soil, coconut powder, peat moss) and planted Spathoglottis plicata seeds in these substrates. They achieved successful results with the best germination obtained in peat moss (Aewsakul et al. 2013).
The results obtained in this study with natural substrates different from those used by Aewsakul et al. (2013) are promising for both conservation and economic purposes. We observed that hazelnut leaves (young and old) had a remarkably positive effect on germination and seedling development compared to other substrates. This situation may arise from the structural or functional molecule content of the substrates. Various secondary metabolites present in straw and oak leaves may have negatively affected fungal activity and/or germination process. It is well known that many phenolic compounds have antifungal or allelopathic activity (Wang et al. 2017), so they may have negatively affected fungal activity under symbiotic germination conditions. The reason why specifically young hazelnut leaves are more effective than other substrates is most likely because during the active photosynthetic phase leaves contain more carbon (including soluble carbon), nitrogen, and other essential elements. Since most of the nutrient elements are transferred to younger leaves during the aging process, old leaves are poorer in terms of nutrient content (Taiz and Zeiger 2010). However, old leaves also contain structural polysaccharides, cellulose, which can be degraded into glucose monomers and transported to the embryo during orchid seed germination (Gong et al. 2023). This can explain satisfactory germination results obtained in our study with substrate from old hazelnut leaves, even without the presence of sucrose. The chemical profiles of these substrates should be evaluated in detail in future studies to determine their potential effects on symbiotic germination.
Conclusions
The addition of organic materials as a supplementary substrate to the nutrient medium was found to enhance the germination and seedling development of A. laxiflora in in vitro conditions. The highest germination and seedling growth was obtained using fresh hazelnut leaves. Sucrose, together with natural organic additives, strongly supported germination and seedling growth. Fresh hazelnut leaves also proved successful in ex vitro conditions providing high percentage of seedlings with developed leaves and roots. Given the importance of orchids and their status as a threatened species, it is critical to develop cheap, easy, and fast methods for their mass production. The use of these substrates for this purpose is promising, as it would not only reduce the cost but also decrease the laboratory dependency, thereby providing new avenues for future research. Further detailed studies are needed to optimize these methods and fully understand their potential for application in orchid production.
References
Aewsakul, N., Maneesorn, D., Serivichyaswat, P., Taluengjit, A., Nontachaiyapoom, S., 2013: Ex vitro symbiotic seed germination of Spathoglottis plicata Blume on common orchid cultivation substrates. Scientia Horticulturae 160, 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.05.034
Arditti, J.,1967: Factors affecting the germination of orchid seeds. The Botanical Review 33, 1–97.
Batty, A. L., Brundrett, M. C., Dixon, K. W., Sivasithamparam, K., 2006: In situ symbiotic seed germination and propagation of terrestrial orchid seedlings for establishment at field sites. Australian Journal of Botany 54(4), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT04024
Cardoso, J. C., Zanello, C. A., Chen, J. T., 2020: An overview of orchid protocorm-like bodies: Mass propagation, biotechnology, molecular aspects, and breeding. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(3), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030985
Clements, M. A., Muir, H., Cribb, P. J., 1986: A preliminary report on the symbiotic germination of European terrestrial orchids. Kew Bulletin 41(2): 437–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/4102957
Deconninck, G., Gerakis, A.,2021: Influence of scarification method on seed germination of the terrestrial orchid (Lam.). The EuroBiotech Journal 5(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/ 10.2478/ebtj-2021-0004
Deniz, İ. G., Kömpe, Y. Ö., Harzli, I., Aytar, E. C., Mutlu, V. A., Uysal, D. İ., 2022: From seed to flowering tuberous orchid using ex vitro symbiotic seed germination: A breakthrough study with Anacamptis sancta, Rhizosphere 24, 100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2022.100597
Duncan, M., Moloney, P. D. 2018: Comparing wild and reintroduced populations of the threatened orchid Diuris fragrantissima (Orchidaceae) in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 66(7), 459–467.
Elezz, A. A., Easa, A., Atia, F., Ahmed, T., 2019: The potential impact data of Tylosin and Enrofloxacin veterinary antibiotics on germination and accumulation in barley seed as a forage crop and good dietary sources using LC/MS-MS. Data in Brief 25: 104326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104326
Ghorbani, A., Gravendeel, B., Naghibi, F., de Boer, H., 2014: Wild orchid tuber collection in Iran: a wake-up call for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 23, 2749–2760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0746-y
Gong, Y., Lebreton, A., Zhang, F., & Martin, F., 2023: Role of carbohydrate-active enzymes in mycorrhizal symbioses. Essays in Biochemistry 67(3), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1042/ebc20220127
Gupta, A., 2016: Asymbiotic seed germination in orchids: role of organic additives. International Advanced Research Journal in Science Engineering and Technology 3(5): 143–147. https://doi.org/10.17148/iarjset.2016.3530
Hadley, G., Perombel, M., 1963: Production of pectic enzymes by Rhizoctonia solani and orchid endophytes. Nature 200: 1337. https://doi.org/10.1038/2001337a0
Hossain, M. M., 2011: Therapeutic orchids: traditional uses and recent advances--an overview. Fitoterapia 82: 102-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2010.09.007
Indan, H., David, D., Jawan, R., Marbawi, H., Gansau, J. A.,2021: Development and characterization of flower and capsule in Borneo jewel orchid MacodeslimiiJJ Wood and AL Lamb (Orchidaceae: Asparagales). Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 14(2): 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2010.09.007
Jacquemyn, H., Brys, R., Jongejans, E., 2010: Size‐dependent flowering and costs of reproduction affect population dynamics in a tuberous perennial woodland orchid. Journal of Ecology 98(5): 1204–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2745.2010.01697.x
Jacquemyn, H., Brys, R., Lievens, B., Wiegand, T., 2012: Spatial variation in below-ground seed germination and divergent mycorrhizal associations correlate with spatial segregation of three co-occurring orchid species. Journal of Ecology 100: 1328–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01998.x
Johnson, T. R., Steward, S. L., Dutra, D., Kane, M. E., Richardson, L., 2007: Asymbiotic and symbiotic seed germination of Eulophia alta (Orchidaceae) preliminary evidence for the symbiotic culture advantage. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cculture 90(3): 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9270-z
Kömpe, Y. Ö., Mutlu, V. A., Özkoç, İ., 2020: The viability of Anacamptis laxiflora (Orchidaceae) seeds and the symbiotic germination. Plant Biosystems 154(6), 800–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2019.1701118
Kömpe, Y. Ö., Mutlu, V. A., 2021: Ex vitro symbiotic germination of the seeds of Anacamptis coriophora (L.) RM Bateman, Pritgeon & MW Chase and Orchis anatolica Boiss. Biologia Futura 72(4), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-021-00100-5
Kömpe, Y. Ö, Mutlu, V. A., Özkoç, İ., Demiray, S., Serhat, B., 2022: Fungal diversity and ex vitro symbiotic germination of Serapias vomeracea (Orchidaceae). Acta Botanica Croatica 81(1), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.37427/botcro-2022-008
Lemay, M. A., De Vriendt, L., Pellerin, S., Poulin, M., 2015: Ex situ germination as a method for seed viability assessment in a peatland orchid, Platanthera blephariglottis. American Journal of Botany 102(3), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400441
Mala, B., Kuegkong, K., Sa-ngiaemsri, N., Nontachaiyapoom, S., 2017: Effect of germination media on in vitro symbiotic seed germination of three Dendrobium orchids. South African Journal of Botany 112: 521–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.05.008
Marvin, L., Gonzales, R., 2015: Germination response of eggplant (SolanummelongenaL.) seeds to different vinegar concentration as seed priming agents. International Journal of Scientific Research Publications 5(3): 770–773.
Mead, J. W., Bulard, C., 1975: Effects of vitamins and nitrogen sources on asymbiotic germination and development of Orchis laxiflora and Ophrys sphegodes. New Phytologist, 74(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1975.tb01336.x
Mead, J. W., Bulard, C., 1979: Vitamins and nitrogen requirements of Orchis laxifloraLamk. New Phytologist 83(1): 129–136.
Mehra, S., Morrison, P. D., Coates, F., Lawrie, A. C., 2017: Differences in carbon source utilisation by orchid mycorrhizal fungi from common and endangered species of Caladenia (Orchidaceae). Mycorrhiza 27, 95–108. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00572- 016-0732-1
Mutlu, V. A., Kömpe, Y. Ö., 2021: Serapias orientalis (Greuter) Bauman & Künkele (Orchidaceae) Tohumlarının İn Vitro Çimlenmesi. (In vitro germination of Serapias orientalis (Greuter) Bauman & Künkele (Orchidaceae) Seeds). Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 8(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.620955
Nicole, F., Brzosko, E., Tıll-Bottraud, I. R. E. N. E., 2005: Population viability analysis of Cypripediumcalceolusin a protected area: longevity, stability and persistence. Journal of Ecology 93(4): 716–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01010.x
Özkoç, I., Dalcı, M., 1993: İki farklı kültür ortamında Orchis laxiflora Lam. (Orchidaceae) tohumlarının çimlenme ve gelişmesi üzerine bazı fungusların etkisi. (The effects of some fungi on germination and development of the seeds of Orchis laxiflora Lam.). Turkish Journal of Biology 17: 23–28.
Quay, L., McComb, J. A., Dixon, K. W., 1995: Methods for ex vitro germination of Australian terrestrial orchids. Hortscience 30: 1445–1446. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.30.7.1445
Phillips, R. D., Reiter, N., Peakall, R., 2020: Orchid conservation: from theory to practice. Annals of Botany 126(3) 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa093
Rasmussen, H. N., Whigham, D. F., 1993: Seed ecology of dust seeds in situ: a new study technique and its application in terrestrial orchids. American journal of botany 80(12), 1374–1378. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb15381.x
Rasmussen, H. N., 1995: Terrestrial orchids: from seed to mycotrophic plant. Cambridge University Press.
Rasmussen, H. N., Dixon, K. W., Jersakova, J., Tesitelova, T., 2015: Germination and seedling establishment in orchids: a complex of requirements. Annals of Botany 116(3):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv087
Sezik, E., 2002: Turkish orchids and salep. Acta Pharmceutica Turcica. 44(3): 151–157.
Smith, S. E., 1966: Physiology and ecology of orchid mycorrhizal fungi with reference to seedling nutrition. The New Phytologist 65: 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469- 8137.1966.tb05972.x
Smith, Z. F., James, E. A., McLean, C. B., 2010: Mycorrhizal specificity of Diuris fragrantissima (Orchidaceae) and persistence in a reintroduced population. Australian Journal of Botany 58(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT09214
Soares, J. S., Santiago, E. F., Sorgato, J. C., 2020: Conservation of Schomburgkia crispa Lindl. (Orchidaceae) by reintroduction into a fragment of the Brazilian Cerrado. Journal for Nature Conservation 53, 125754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125754
Štípková, Z., Tsiftsis, S., Kindlmann, P., 2021: How did the agricultural policy during the communist period affect the decline in orchid biodiversity in central and eastern Europe?. Global Ecology and Conservation 26: e01498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01498
Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., 2010: Plant Physiology 5th Ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Tikendra, L., Potshangbam, A. M., Amom, T., Dey, A., Nongdam, P., 2021: Understanding the genetic diversity and population structure of Dendrobium chrysotoxum Lindl.-An endangered medicinal orchid and implication for its conservation. South African Journal of Botany 138: 364–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.01.002
Wang, M., Jiang, N., Wang, Y., Jiang, D., Feng, X., 2017: Characterization of phenolic compounds from early and late ripening sweet cherries and their antioxidant and antifungal activities. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65(26), 5413–5420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01409
Wang, M., Li, S., Chen, L., Li, J., Li, L., Rao, W., Liu, H., Chen, J., Ren, H., 2021: Conservation and reintroduction of the rare and endangered orchid Paphiopedilum armeniacum. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 7(1), 1903817. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2021.1903817
Wood, J., Ramsay, M., 2004: Plate 482. Anacamptis laxiflora Orchidaceae. Curtis's Botanical Magazine 21(1), 26–33.
Yam, T. W., Arditti, J., 2009: History of orchid propagation: a mirror of the history of biotechnology. Plant Biotechnology Report 3:1–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-008- 0066-3
Yi-Bo, L. U. O., Jian-Sheng, J. I. A., Chun-Ling, W. A. N. G., 2003: A general review of the conservation status of Chinese orchids. Biodiversity Science 11: 70–77. https://doi.org/ 10.17520/biods.2003010
Zettler, L. W., Hofer, C. J., 1998: Propagation of the little club-spur orchid (Platanthera clavellata) by symbiotic seed germination and its ecological implications. Environmental and Experimental Botany 39(3), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00019-1
Zhao, D. K., Selosse, M. A., Wu, L., Luo, Y., Shao, S. C., Ruan, Y. L., 2021: Orchid reintroduction based on seed germination-promoting mycorrhizal fungi derived from protocorms or seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science 12,701152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.701152
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years, orchid species have become endangered due to excessive collection and habitat destruction. As with most flowering plants, seed production is the primary strategy for reproduction in orchids. Orchids produce tiny seeds consisting of a seed coat and a rudimentary embryo. However, it lacks the endosperm, which is generally required as the primary energy source during germination. The only way to germinate orchid seeds is to get nutrients from an external source. In nature, this is achieved by mycorrhizal symbiosis. This study used Ceratobasidium sp. inoculation of Anacamptis laxiflora (Lam.) seeds combined with media with various organic substrates to determine their effectiveness on in vitro germination and seedling development. The highest germination rate (35.78%) was obtained in the medium with the addition of young hazelnut leaves. Then, soilless ex vitro symbiotic germination was performed on young hazelnut leaves, the most effective organic substrate. Seed germination was determined to be 19.01% in this medium while 14.87% seedlings with developed leaves and roots were formed. For the first time, success was achieved by producing A. laxiflora from seed in ex vitro conditions without soil and adapting it to nature.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2023 Erdi Can AYTAR, Yasemin Özdener Kömpe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Acta Botanica Croatica is an Open Access journal with minimal restrictions regarding content reuse. Immediately after publishing, all content becomes freely available to anyone for unlimited use and distribution, under the sole condition that the author(s) and the original source are properly attributed according to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
CC BY 4.0 represents the highest level of Open Access, which maximizes dissemination of scholarly work and protects the rights of its authors. In Acta Botanica Croatica, authors hold the copyright of their work and retain unrestricted publishing rights.
By approving final Proof the authors grant to the publisher exclusive license to publish their article in print and on-line, in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-4.0) license.