Trehalose-induced metabolic responses in basil (Ocimum basilicum) seedlings under salt treatment

Introduction

Salinity is one of the most important factors limiting the yield of crops, especially in arid, semi-arid, and coastal areas (Mostofa et al. 2015). This stress negatively affects plant physiology by imposing several major limitations leading to reduced crop growth and productivity (Ali et al. 2021, Zhang et al. 2021, Khan et al. 2023). Salinity causes osmotic and ionic stress, and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plant cells (Ahammed et al. 2018, Khan et al. 2023, Colin et al. 2023). High production of ROS induces oxidative stress, which can destroy membrane components and biomolecules and, at higher levels, cause cell, tissue, and plant death (Kaur et al. 2022, Khan et al. 2023, Peng et al. 2023). Salinity tolerance is a complex process that involves various molecular, physiological, and biochemical mechanisms (Zhang and Shi 2013, Islam et al. 2023).

The use of osmoprotectants can augment stress tolerance mechanisms in plants (Chen and Jiang 2010, Islam et al. 2023). These compounds, which are known as compatible solutes, are highly soluble compounds with low molecular weight that directly or indirectly protect plants against stresses through various mechanisms such as regulating cellular osmosis, preventing membrane damage, stabilizing proteins and enzymes, and eliminating ROS (Singh et al. 2015, He et al. 2018). Application of exogenous osmoprotectants can be considered an alternative approach to improve plant productivity under saline conditions (Nakayama et al. 2005). The high concentration of compatible solutes can balance the salts entering the cell and at the same time deal with the high concentration of salts inside the cell (Türkan and Demiral 2009).

Sugars are one of the most important compatible solutes that, in addition to the role of signal molecules, can act as a source of metabolic energy and play a role in regulating metabolism in plants (Islam and Mohammad 2021). Trehalose (Tre) is a non-reducing disaccharide consisting of two glucose molecules with a chemically non-reactive nature that makes it compatible with cellular metabolism even at high concentrations, and plays an important role as an osmoprotectant in stress tolerance of some plants (Ali and Ashraf 2011, Lunn et al. 2014). It is naturally distributed in many organisms, from bacteria and fungi to plants and invertebrates (Nounjan et al. 2012, Kosar et al. 2019), where it is used for carbon storage and transport as well as being an osmoprotectant (Lunn et al. 2014). Among plants, Tre synthesis has been reported in some resurrection plants and other plants such as Arabidopsis (Muller et al. 1999, Lunn et al. 2014). It has been shown that the expression of plant genes involved in Tre metabolism undergoes remarkable changes in response to various abiotic stresses (Nakashima et al. 2009). Tre and trehalose-6-phosphate, a phosphorylated intermediate in Tre biosynthesis, act as signal molecules in carbohydrate metabolism (Wingler et al. 2000, Lunn et al. 2014). Tre induces sucrose synthase activity in soybean (Muller et al. 1998) and trehalose-6-phosphate acts as a specific signal of sucrose status in Arabidopsis, and may be seen as part of a homeostatic mechanism to control the level of sucrose, as well as part of regulatory networks in sucrose export in source organs and in growing sink organs (Lunn et al 2014). Tre has also a key role in the control of metabolism during plant growth and development, and reduces the effects of stress through mechanisms such as membrane protection, stabilization of proteins and enzymes, detoxification and removal of ROS, molecular signaling, and increasing the accumulation of osmolytes (Luo et al. 2010, Abdallah et al. 2016, Islam and Mohammad 2021). Most studies on the role of osmoprotectants in enhancing stress tolerance have focused on proline and glycine betaine, but there is relatively little knowledge about the effects of Tre on higher plants ­under stress conditions. Some studies have shown that the exogenous application of Tre on plants has induced tolerance to salinity stress (Nounjan et al. 2012, Abdallah et al. 2016, Rohman et al. 2019). In contrast, it has been found that Tre can have an inhibitory effect on the growth of some plants (Schluepmann et al. 2004, O'Hara et al. 2013) and algae under salinity (Panjekobi and Einali 2021). However, in most plants, endogenous Tre cannot adequately ameliorate the harmful effects of stress (Mostofa et al. 2015).

Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) is a medicinal and aromatic plant that is used in the pharmaceutical and food industries due to its abundant essential oils, high content of phytomedicines and natural antioxidant molecules, and is usually produced for economic purposes (Kwee and ­Niemeyer 2011, Caliskan et al. 2017). It is commonly used in traditional medicine and herbal therapy (Bahcesular et al. 2020, Farouk and Omar 2020). To date, no study has been conducted on the role of Tre in the physiological and biochemical responses of basil, an important agricultural and medicinal plant, to salinity stress. Accordingly, basil was taken as a model system to determine the effect of exogenous Tre on growth, accumulation of osmolytes, and the activity of some enzymes of the antioxidant system under salt stress.

Materials and methods

Plant material and experimental design

Basil seeds (Ocimum basilicum L.) obtained from the Botanic Garden at the University of Sistan and Baluchestan were sown in a greenhouse with a temperature of 29 ± 1 °C in trays containing moist cocopeat. After germination, seedlings with two or three leaves that had grown uniformly were selected and each seedling was transferred to a 14 x12 cm plastic pot containing 1 kg of cocopeat and placed at the same temperature. Seedlings were irrigated with 1/2 Hoagland's standard nutrient solution at three-day intervals until reaching the 6-8 leaf stage. Three days before salt treatment, the seedlings were divided into two parts. By foliar spraying on the seedlings, one part was treated with a concentration of 5 mM Tre and the other part received only distilled water. Salinity treatment was applied by adding sodium chloride (NaCl) in concentrations of 0, 25, 50, 100, and 150 mM to the nutrient solutions of each plant group. Tre-untreated plants, which received only 1/2 Hoagland's solution without NaCl, were considered as the control for salinity experiments. Seedlings were treated twice a week with salinity and every week with Tre for four weeks. After this period, seedlings were harvested and studied to investigate the morphological and biochemical responses to salt stress and Tre treatment. Each morphological or biochemical experiment was performed individually with three biological replicates.

Morphological traits

The length of root and shoot along with the length, width, and number of leaves of basil seedlings were measured. To determine the amount of biomass, first the fresh weight (FW) of each shoot and root was measured, and ­after exposure to 70 °C for 72 h, the dry weight (DW) was determined. Shoot water content (SWC) of basil seedlings was obtained using the following formula:

SWC = ((shoot FW− shoot DW)/shoot FW) × 100

Determination of photosynthetic pigments content

Photosynthetic pigments including chlorophyll (Chl) and total carotenoids (Car) were extracted from 1 g of fresh leaf tissue with 80% acetone. The resulting mixture was ­filtered through filter paper (Whatman No. 1) and the residue was saved to measure soluble sugars and total protein. The absorbance of the filtrate was recorded at 663, 645, and 652 nm, and the amounts of Chls a, b, and total were measured using the following equations (Arnon 1949):

Chl a (mg mL–1) = 0.0127 × A663 - 0.00269 × A645

Chl b (mg mL–1) = 0.0229 × A645 - 0.00468 × A663

Total Chl (mg mL–1) = A652/34.5

Total Car content was measured at 470 nm using the ­following equation (Lichtenthaler and Buschmann, 2001):

Total Car (μg mL–1) = (1000 × A470–1.82 × Chl a – 85.02 × Chl b)/198

The content of pigments was expressed as mg per g FW.

Determination of soluble sugars and starch content

Soluble sugars, including reducing and non-reducing sugars, were extracted from 40 mg of acetone powder (­resulting from the extraction of photosynthetic pigments) using 80% ethanol (Einali and Valizadeh 2017). Ethanol extracts were used to determine the content of soluble sugars. Reducing sugars (RS) were determined by the method of Miller (1959) and non-reducing sugars (NRS) were measured by Handel's (1968) method. The residues obtained from the extraction of soluble sugars were used to extract and measure the amount of starch (McCready et al. 1950). The content of soluble sugars and starch was expressed as mg per g FW.

Determination of total proteins, total amino acid, and proline content

Total proteins refer to proteins extracted with a sample buffer containing 60 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 6.8), 10% (v/v) glycerol, and 2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (Stone and Gifford (1997). Extraction of total proteins from 20 mg of acetone powder was done with 0.5 mL of sample buffer at 90 °C for 1 h, followed by centrifugation at 10000 g for 15 minutes (Alisofi et al. 2020). The amount of total proteins was measured at a wavelength of 750 nm by the method of Markwell et al. (1981) and expressed as mg per g FW.

Free amino acids and proline were extracted from 0.2 g of fresh leaf tissue using 80% ethanol at 70 °C for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 2000 g for 10 min (Einali and Valizadeh 2017). The extraction process was repeated four more times. The concentrated ethanol extract was decolored by chloroform (1:5, v/v). The ninhydrin (1% (w/v) ninhydrin and 0.06% (w/v) KCN in acetone) method using a glycine calibration curve at 570 nm was used to determine total free amino acid (Yemm and Cocking 1955). Proline content was measured at 520 nm by another ninhydrin (1% (w/v) nin­hydrin in 60% (v/v) acetic acid) method using proline as a standard (Bates et al. 1973). The content of free amino acids and proline was expressed as µmol per g FW.

Soluble protein extraction and enzyme assays

Crude enzyme extract was prepared from 0.2 g of fresh leaf tissue with 3 mL of enzyme extraction buffer containing 100 mM cold potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 10% ­glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM ­phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, and 1% (w/v) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) as described elsewhere (Alisofi et al. 2020). Extraction was done in a cold mortar with pestle. The extraction buffer for ascorbate peroxidase (APX) determination contained 5 mM ascorbic acid as well. The homogenate was filtered through four layers of cheesecloth and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h. The amount of 10 mg of charcoal was added to the filter to remove the extracted pigments, and then it was centrifuged at 12000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant, containing soluble protein fraction, was used for enzyme assays. Soluble proteins refer to proteins extracted in the ­absence of sodium dodecyl sulfate. Soluble protein content was measured by Bradford's (1976) method using the albumin standard curve and expressed as mg per g FW.

APX reaction mixture (1 mL) consisted of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 1 mM H2O2, 0.5 mM ascorbic acid, and 50 µL enzyme extract. The oxidation of ascorbate to dehydroascorbate was monitored at 290 nm and the activity of the enzyme was calculated using the extinction coefficient 2.8 mM-1 cm-1 and expressed as µmol of oxidized ascorbate per min per g FW (Chen and Asada 1992).

The activity of pyrogallol peroxidase (PPX) was measured in a reaction mixture (1 mL) containing 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 40 mM pyrogallol, 1 mM H2O2, and 50 µL enzyme extract. The conversion rate of ­pyrogallol to purpurogallin was monitored at 430 nm and the enzyme activities were calculated using the extinction coefficient 2.47 mM-1 cm-1 and expressed as µmol of ­purpurogallin produced per min per g FW (Nakano and Asada 1981). Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity was measured in the same way as PPX at 430 nm using the extinction coefficient 2.47 mM-1 cm-1, except that the reaction mixture was without H2O2 (Nakano and Asada 1981).

Statistical analysis

All results obtained from plant growth and biochemical studies were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) of three independent measurements. The statistically ­significant difference between treatments was determined in the form of factorial design using two-way ANOVA and Duncan's test at the level of 5% (P < 0.05).

Results

Effect of salinity and Tre on plant growth

Salt treatment at low concentration (25 mM) caused a clear 15% increase in shoot length compared to the control, but higher salt concentrations gradually decreased these values (Tab. 1).

Tab. 1. Longitudinal growth and leaf characteristics of trehalose-treated (+Tre) or untreated (-Tre) basil seedlings in response to different salinity concentrations. Values are the mean ± standard deviation of three separate measurements. Different letters in each column indicate significant differences between the various treatments at P < 0.05 according to the Duncan test. LL - leaf length; LW - leaf weight.

Salt treatment (mM) Plant length (cm) LL (cm) LW (cm) LL/LW LL × LW (cm2) Number of leaves
Shoot Root
0 -Tre 26.00 ± 1.00b 19.67 ± 2.08a 3.77 ± 0.46a 1.93 ± 0.12a 1.95 ± 0.20a 7.30 ± 1.18a 14.00 ± 1.00ab
+Tre 23.33 ± 0.58c 22.67 ± 2.08a 2.67 ± 0.29bc 1.63 ± 0.06b 1.64 ± 0.21a 4.35 ± 0.41c 14.00 ± 0.00a
25 -Tre 30.00 ± 1.00a 20.00 ± 2.00a 4.33 ± 0.76a 2.10 ± 0.17a 2.07 ± 0.39a 9.12 ± 1.84a 16.00 ± 0.00a
+Tre 24.00 ± 2.65c 21.00 ± 1.00a 2.93 ± 0.31bc 1.70 ± 0.10b 1.73 ± 0.18a 4.99 ± 0.69bc 14.67 ± 1.15ab
50 -Tre 26.33 ± 2.08b 21.00 ± 1.00a 4.03 ± 0.45a 2.23 ± 0.21a 1.80 ± 0.07a 9.07 ± 1.80a 15.33 ± 1.15a
+Tre 21.33 ± 1.53d 21.33 ± 1.53a 3.13 ± 0.15b 1.67 ± 0.15b 1.89 ± 0.15a 5.23 ± 0.63bc 14.67 ± 1.15ab
100 -Tre 24.33 ± 0.58c 23.00 ± 2.65a 3.87 ± 0.32a 2.13 ± 0.21a 1.81 ± 0.03a 8.29 ± 1.46a 15.33 ± 1.15a
+Tre 20.33 ± 2.08d 19.33 ± 1.15a 3.20 ± 0.10b 1.77 ± 0.06b 1.81 ± 0.08a 5.65 ± 0.26b 14.67 ± 1.15ab
150 -Tre 21.33 ± 1.53d 21.00 ± 0.00a 3.50 ± 0.30ab 1.93 ± 0.12a 1.81 ± 0.19a 6.77 ± 0.72a 13.33 ± 1.15b
+Tre 14.67 ± 1.53e 19.67 ± 1.53a 2.70 ± 0.17c 1.37 ± 0.15c 1.98 ± 0.11a 3.71 ± 0.63d 13.33 ± 1.15b
Table 1.

However, salinity did not affect root length and leaf characteristics including length (LL), width (LW), LL/LW ratio, LL × LW production, and number of leaves. Tre treatment alone or under salt stress had a significant negative effect on the length of the shoot and some leaf characteristics compared to untreated controls, but it did not change the root length and the number of leaves (Tab. 1).

Although SWC remained unchanged, the effect of salinity on fresh and dry weight of shoots and fresh weight of roots was negative and caused a decrease proportional to salt concentration, while the dry weight of roots increased significantly in response to different salt treatments compared to the control (Tab. 2).

Tab. 2. Shoot and root biomass accumulation and water content of trehalose-treated (+Tre) or untreated (-Tre) basil seedlings in response to different salinity concentrations. Values are the mean ± standard deviation of three separate measurements. Different letters in each column indicate significant differences between the various treatments at P < 0.05 according to the Duncan test. FW - fresh weight; DW - dry weight; SWC - shoot water content.

Salt treatment (mM) FW (g) DW (g) FW/DW SWC (%)
Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root
0 -Tre 2.19 ± 0.08a 0.43 ± 0.04a 0.60 ± 0.01a 0.05 ± 0.01c 3.64 ± 0.08c 9.50 ± 2.20a 72.49 ± 0.58d
+Tre 1.06 ± 0.16c 0.18 ± 0.02d 0.23 ± 0.07de 0.08 ± 0.01b 4.76 ± 1.04b 2.26 ± 0.43e 78.35 ± 4.49cd
25 -Tre 1.99 ± 0.31ab 0.31 ± 0.03b 0.52 ± 0.01b 0.10 ± 0.01b 3.83 ± 0.62bc 3.21 ± 0.21d 73.41 ± 4.20d
+Tre 1.12 ± 0.25c 0.26 ± 0.04bc 0.25 ± 0.05de 0.06 ± 0.01c 4.61 ± 0.91b 4.66 ± 0.82b 77.67 ± 4.90cd
50 -Tre 2.29 ± 0.31a 0.32 ± 0.02b 0.43 ± 0.06c 0.12 ± 0.01a 5.29 ± 0.09b 2.74 ± 0.30e 81.09 ± 0.31c
+Tre 1.64 ± 0.14b 0.16 ± 0.03de 0.27 ± 0.03d 0.06 ± 0.02c 6.19 ± 0.79b 2.80 ± 0.55e 83.65 ± 2.26c
100 -Tre 1.71 ± 0.21b 0.24 ± 0.04c 0.41 ± 0.08c 0.09 ± 0.01b 4.28 ± 0.91c 2.52 ± 0.28e 76.00 ± 4.75cd
+Tre 1.38 ± 0.15b 0.29 ± 0.05bc 0.23 ± 0.02e 0.06 ± 0.00c 6.03 ± 0.60b 4.79 ± 0.94b 83.31 ± 1.57bc
150 -Tre 1.10 ± 0.04c 0.13 ± 0.02e 0.30 ± 0.01d 0.07 ± 0.01c 3.73 ± 0.20c 1.84 ± 0.02f 73.13 ± 1.41d
+Tre 1.01 ± 0.04c 0.08 ± 0.01f 0.11 ± 0.02f 0.02 ± 0.00d 9.56 ± 0.96a 3.86 ± 0.39c 89.47 ± 1.11a
Table 2.

Tre application in most salt treatments caused a decrease in fresh and dry weight of shoot and root, so that the decrease in dry weight was more intense. In contrast, Tre treatment caused a 23% increase in SWC in seedlings exposed to 150 mM NaCl compared to the untreated control (Tab. 2).

Effect of salinity and Tre on photosynthetic pigments

The amount of Chl and Car in response to salinity of 50 mM and above decreased significantly compared to the control (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Fig. 1. Effect of different salinity concentrations on content of Chl a (A), Chl b (B), and total Chl (C), as well as on Chl a / b ratio (D), total Car (E), and Chl / Car ratio (F) in trehalose-treated (+Tre) or untreated (-Tre) basil seedlings. Results are the mean ± standard deviation of three separate measurements. Different letters indicate significant differences between the various treatments at P < 0.05 according to the Duncan test.

Although the 25 mM concentration of NaCl had no ­effect on the amount of Chl b and total Car compared to the control (Fig. 1B, 1D), it caused a significant increase in the content of Chl a and total Chl by 41 and 30%, respectively (Fig. 1A, 1C). A significant or non-significant increase in response to 25 mM salinity was observed in Chl a/b and Chl/Car ratios, respectively, which decreased or remained unchanged at higher salinities compared to the control (Fig. 1D, 1E). Tre treatment resulted in a significant decrease in pigments amount and Chl a/b ratio at most salt levels compared to untreated controls (Fig. 1A-1E). However, the Chl/Car ratio increased in salt treatments with a NaCl ­concentration above 25 mM (Fig. 1F).

Effect of salinity and Tre on soluble sugars and starch contents

All salt treatments caused a sharp increase in the content of soluble sugars, including reducing, non-reducing and total sugars, compared to the control (Fig. 2A-2C), so that total soluble sugars reached 145.81 mg g-1 FW under 150 mM NaCl (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2.

Fig. 2. Effect of different salinity concentrations on content of reducing sugars, RS (A), non-reducing sugars, NRS (B), and total soluble sugars, TSS (C), as well as on reducing / non-reducing sugars, RS/NRS ratio (D), and starch content (E) in trehalose-treated (+Tre) or untreated (-Tre) basil seedlings. Results are the mean ± standard deviation of three separate measurements. Different letters indicate significant differences between the various treatments at P < 0.05 according to the Duncan test.

However, a significant decrease in RS/NRS ratio and starch content was found under all salinities compared to control (Fig. 2D, 2E). Tre treatment increased soluble sugars in non-stress or salinity conditions up to 50 mM NaCl concentration compared to untreated plants, but at higher salt concentrations, it caused a slight increase in NRS and a significant decrease in RS (Fig. 2A-2C). Tre alone increased the ratio of RS/NRS by 22% compared to the ­untreated control, but did not change this ratio at mild ­salinity (25 and 50 mM NaCl) or even decreased it to the same extent at 100 and 150 mM NaCl (Fig. 2D). These changes were associated with the accumulation of starch in Tre-treated seedlings at salt concentrations of 50 mM and higher (Fig. 2E).

Effect of salinity and Tre on total proteins, total amino acid, and proline contents

The positive effect of salinity on total protein content was observed only at 25 mM salt concentration with a 75% increase and no significant change was found in other salt treatments, while all salinity levels significantly increased soluble proteins, especially up to 10.88 mg g-1 FW under 50 mM NaCl (Fig. 3A, 3B).

Figure 3.

Fig. 3. Effect of different salinity concentrations on contents of total proteins (A), total soluble proteins (B), total amino acids (C), and proline (D) in trehalose-treated (+Tre) or untreated (-Tre) basil seedlings. Results are the mean ± standard deviation of three separate measurements. Different letters indicate significant differences between the various treatments at P < 0.05 according to the Duncan test.

Salinity also caused the accumulation of amino acids and proline so that this increase was proportional to the salt concentration and reached 151 and 247% of control for amino acids and proline in 150 mM NaCl concentration, respectively (Fig. 3C, 3D). Tre treatment at all sali­nity concentrations caused a strong increase in total proteins, amino acids, and proline contents, which was associated with a decrease in the concentration of soluble proteins (Fig. 3).

Effect of salinity and Tre on enzyme activities

The activity of antioxidant enzymes including APX, PPX, and PPO increased strongly with salt concentration and reached 144, 179, and 218% at 150 mM NaCl compared to the control (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Fig. 4. Effect of different salinity concentrations on the activity of ascorbate peroxidase, APX (A), pyrogallol peroxidase, PPX (B), and polyphenol oxidase, PPO (C) in trehalose-treated (+Tre) or untreated (-Tre) basil seedlings. Results are the mean ± standard deviation of three separate measurements. Different letters indicate significant differences between the various treatments at P < 0.05 according to the Duncan test.

Tre treatment alone or with concentrations of up to 100 mM salt strongly decreased APX activity but increased its activity at 150 mM salt concentration by 24% compared to untreated control (Fig. 4A). PPX enzyme activity did not change in plants treated with Tre alone, but it was strongly increased at 25 mM salinity by 92%, slightly decreased at higher salt concentrations, and significantly decreased at 150 mM salinity by 56% compared to untreated control (Fig. 4B). The activity of PPO enzyme showed a 62% decrease in Tre-treated seedlings compared to untreated ones under non-stress conditions, but it increased significantly by 58 and 104% at concentrations of 25 and 50 mM salt, ­respectively, and remained unchanged at higher salinities (Fig. 4C).

Discussion

Much research has documented the negative effect of salinity on plant growth and biomass (Ahmad and Jhon 2005, Yoon et al. 2009, Qiu et al. 2014, Ahmad et al. 2018, Scagel et al. 2019, Sheyhakinia et al. 2020). Despite the reduction of some growth indices in basil seedlings under saline conditions, root length, leaf characteristics, and shoot water content did not change and root dry weight increased. Considering the lack of change in the length of the root and also the decrease in the ratio of fresh weight to dry weight of the root under salinity, which is due to a decrease in fresh weight and increase of dry weight, the increase of root biomass can be caused by the accumulation of nutrients in the organ during stress. In fact, salinity causes a change in the pattern of carbon allocation between roots and shoots. This change in the pattern of carbon distribution during salinity is associated with the reduction of shoot biomass. An increase in root biomass and a decrease in shoot biomass under salt stress have been reported (Bernstein and Kafkafi 2002, Imada et al. 2015). Since this process is similar to the responses of roots and shoots to soil water availability (Zhang et al. 2005, McCarthy and Enquist 2007, Imada et al. 2008), one of the reasons is probably the reduction of soil moisture absorption (McCarthy and Enquist 2007). In fact, the inhibition of growth induced by salinity may be related to the reduction of water absorption due to the reduction of soil osmotic potential. Such a phenomenon leads to cell dehydration and loss of turgor pressure, which leads to growth arrest (Zhao et al. 2021). In addition, salinity leads to the accumulation of Na+ and Cl- ions, which reduces the absorption and transport of nutrients due to competitive interactions with their transporters (Zhao et al. 2021, Gao et al. 2022). However, in our results, salinity-induced growth reduction was observed without a change in shoot water content, indicating that this reduction is associated with continuous water uptake and maintenance of shoot turgor pressure, as previously documented (De Costa et al. 2007, Alisofi et al. 2020, Sheyhakinia et al. 2020). Accumulation of proline in basil seedlings under salinity can explain the uninterrupted water uptake and thus the maintenance of shoot water content despite growth limitation. Therefore, changes in carbon partitioning and accumulation of osmolytes to continue water absorption by plants can be the main reason for growth inhibition under saline conditions. The results of studies on Hibiscus sabdariffa (Sheyhakinia et al. 2020) and Momordica charantia (Alisofi et al. 2020) under salt stress are in good agreement with our findings.

Contrary to previous studies on the effect of Tre on plant growth under salinity stress (Mostofa et al. 2015, Abdallah et al. 2020), Tre treatment in most salinities decreased shoot length and fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots in basil seedlings, so that the dry weight reduction was more severe. Early experiments on the effect of Tre on higher plants through inhibition of trehalase (a Tre-degrading enzyme) in species with very low trehalase activity showed that Tre accumulation is toxic or at least Tre acts as a plant growth inhibitor possibly through inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis (Veluthambi et al. 1981, Veluthambi et al. 1982a). This effect is associated with a disturbance in carbohydrate ­metabolism as indicated by a decrease in sucrose content (­Veluthambi et al. 1982b). Therefore, the reduction of growth in basil seedlings due to Tre treatment can be related to the low activity of this enzyme. Meanwhile, in plant species with high trehalase enzyme activity, such as ­Raphanus ­sativus, Quamoclit phoenicea, and Zea mays, toxicity and inhibition of growth by Tre were not observed (Veluthambi et al. 1981). In transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings in which trehalase enzyme activity was overexpressed, there was no effect of growth inhibition in the presence of Tre, unlike the control (Schluepmann et al. 2004). Therefore, the decrease of growth induced by Tre can be due to the plant's inability to metabolize it, which leads to the accumulation of trehalose-6-phosphate and subsequently to the reduction of the glucose-6-phosphate pool (Schluepmann et al. 2004). In addition, it has been found that trehalose-6-phosphate induces plant defense responses, which are associated with growth reduction (Reignault et al. 2001, Brodmann et al. 2002, Renard-Merlier et al. 2007). However, Tre did not ­affect SWC in basil seedlings up to 100 mM NaCl, but increased it in seedlings exposed to 150 mM NaCl. This event is associated with proline hyperaccumulation, so it can be concluded that changes in carbon partitioning and directing it to proline biosynthesis are the reason for Tre-induced growth inhibition under saline conditions. Considering the role of Tre and its metabolism in the regulation of growth and development (Nunes et al. 2013, O'Hara et al. 2013), it is likely that this metabolite is involved in the growth regulation processes of basil seedlings. In this regard, it has recently been found that methyl jasmonate treatment not only does not reduce the harmful effects of salinity stress in radish (Raphanus sativus) but can even inhibit plant growth (Henschel et al. 2023). This shows that signal molecules and osmolytes such as Tre, which usually increase tolerance to environmental stresses, do not work in the same way in all plants and their performance against different stresses can depend on the type of plant species.

It has been found that the concentration of photosynthetic pigments is sensitive to environmental stresses and in most plants, it decreases significantly in response to salinity (Ahmad and Jhon 2005, Gunes et al. 2007, Yoon et al. 2009, Qiu et al. 2014). However, a study on tomato has shown that 0.3 M salt concentration induces Chl production per unit of leaf area (Agong et al. 2004). This shows that very low salinity induces Chl biosynthesis in basil, as observed in the concentration of Chl a and total Chl at 25 mM NaCl. In addition, the observed decrease in Chl a/b and Chl / Car ratios in response to salinity shows the greater sensitivity of Chl a compare to Chl b and Chl to Car. Contrary to current studies on the role of Tre in increasing the photosynthetic pigments of different plants under salinity (Theerakulpisut and Phongngarm 2013, Abdallah et al. 2016, 2020), treatment of basil seedlings with Tre in most salinities showed a significant decrease in pigment content compared to ­untreated plants. The increase in the ratio of Chl a/b in ­Tre-treated seedlings under non-stress conditions or not changing it at the concentration of 25 mM indicates the greater sensitivity of Chl b to Tre. It has been found that the biosynthesis of Chl b is carried out through the oxidation of a methyl group to a formyl group on the B ring of the Chl a molecule (Porra et al. 1994). Therefore, it can be assumed that the enzyme(s) involved in Chl a biosynthesis are more active than Chl b due to Tre treatment alone or in combination with low salinity. However, the sharp decrease of this ratio in salt concentrations of 50 mM and higher shows the greater sensitivity of Chl a to Tre. The change pattern of the Chl to Car ratio also shows the lower sensitivity of Car to Tre in non-stressed conditions or in combination with low salinity and its greater sensitivity in higher salinity concentrations. Considering the negative effect of Tre on the growth of basil seedlings under salt stress, the reduction of photosynthetic pigments can be attributed to the inability of plants to properly metabolize Tre or direct carbon to ­other metabolic pathways.

Accumulation of sugars or osmotic regulators in plant cells under salinity is a strategy to control plant water content and inhibit water loss (Chaves et al. 2009). The role of the accumulation of soluble sugars in salinity stress tolerance has been widely studied (Mishra et al. 2008, Yin et al. 2010). This indicates the type of basil strategy in salinity tolerance that is done through the accumulation of soluble sugars. Considering the sharp decrease in the ratio of RS/NRS under salt stress compared to the control, it can be concluded that the accumulation of NRS occurs at a higher rate than RS during salt treatment. In addition, the numerical comparison of the amount of these sugars in response to different salt concentrations shows that the accumulation of NRS is almost twice as much as RS. This indicates the important role of non-reducing sugars in basil seedlings for salinity tolerance. On the other hand, the increase of soluble sugars during salinity stress is associated with the decrease in starch content. This suggests that a change in photosynthetic carbon partitioning occurs in basil seedlings during salinity stress, leading to more sucrose synthesis and less starch accumulation. The higher accumulation of NRS than RS confirms this. However, starch breakdown can also increase soluble sugars during salt stress. The conversion of starch to sugars, especially NRS, and a change in their metabolism, which has been introduced as a common defense strategy against water stress, is possible through increasing the activity of starch hydrolyzing enzymes such as amylases and simultaneous decrease of sucrose hydrolyzing activities (Kumari and Asthir 2016). The unremarkable increase of NRS content in Tre-treated seedlings under salinity compared to the untreated controls indicates that this metabolite does not accumulate in basil seedlings. This finding can confirm the hypothesis that Tre accumulates in some Tre-treated plants in another form such as trehalose-6-phosphate (Schluepmann et al. 2004). This proves that the effects of Tre on growth are due to changes in carbohydrate metabolism. Evidence to support this hypothesis comes from the observation that the simultaneous addition of sucrose in the presence of Tre and starch accumulation restores growth in response to Tre feeding (Wingler et al. 2000). Tre feeding leads to an increase in ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase gene expression as well as an increase in its enzyme activity, which is crucial in starch biosynthesis (Wingler et al. 2000). In addition, trehalose-6-phosphate also plays a role in the activation of this enzyme (Kolbe et al. 2005). Various studies have shown that growth was impaired after an increase of the gene expression of this enzyme in potato plants, but with the addition of sucrose, growth returned to the normal state (Stark et al. 1992). Accordingly, one of the reasons for Tre-induced growth inhibition during salt treatment can be due to the reduction of carbon for export to growth areas because of starch accumulation.

Environmental stresses, including salinity, generally cause protein degradation or reduced synthesis due to the acceleration of the aging process (Mishra et al. 2008, Misra and Saxena 2009). The results of our study on basil seedlings showed the opposite of this finding, which could indicate an increase in the synthesis of stress-specific proteins or enzyme proteins during the salinity period. The observed decrease in soluble protein levels, which was accompanied by a significant increase in total protein content in Tre-treated seedlings, could be attributed to a change in their solubility due to Tre treatment. This suggestion is supported by the fact that the level of soluble protein is positively correlated with protein solubility (Afify et al. 2012, Ma et al. 2019, ­Ebert et al. 2020). Therefore, the increase in total protein while the soluble protein decreased can be due to the role of Tre in reducing the solubility of proteins. The response of basil seedlings to Tre treatment can confirm that the pathway of carbon partitioning and its metabolism is changed due to Tre treatment, which in turn reduces growth in ­Tre-treated seedlings under salinity conditions. Similar ­results regarding the effects of Tre on salinity tolerance and its role in carbon partitioning have also been reported in Dunaliella bardawil (Panjekobi and Einali 2021).

Accumulation of amino acids and proline is considered a common response during environmental stress, and is often associated with the improvement of plant tolerance to stress conditions (Claussen 2005, Khadri et al. 2006, Yoon et al. 2009). However, some studies have shown that the level of accumulated proline indicates the severity of stress symptoms when plants are exposed to different types of abiotic stresses (Metwally et al. 2003, Mostofa et al. 2014, 2015). A study on Cathranthus roseus under salt stress showed that proline accumulation under stress conditions is negatively correlated with relative water content, biomass, and potassium accumulation (Chang et al. 2014). However, the lack of change in SWC in saline conditions or its increase due to Tre treatment and high salt dose, which is associated with proline accumulation, can indicate the increase of this metabolite in order to maintain the water content of the plant. Therefore, in our study, the excessive accumulation of amino acids and proline that occurred especially due to Tre treatment is related to the maintenance of water content, which is caused by Tre-induced metabolic changes during salt stress. In this way, the increase of these metabolites in seedlings treated with Tre alone also indicates a kind of stressful condition. On the contrary, studies on plants treated with Tre under salt (Nounjan et al. 2012, Mostofa et al. 2014, Sadak, 2019) and drought stress (Ali and Ashraf 2011) show a lower level of proline or amino acid in these plants, which could indicate a lower demand for proline or a compensatory mechanism for Tre, because both can act as an osmoprotectant.

The increased activity of antioxidant enzymes in response to salinity can be considered as an indication of increased ROS production and a common protective mechanism to reduce oxidative damage caused by salinity. These results are consistent with other studies on the role of ROS-scavenging enzymes under salt stress (Ahmad et al. 2018, Alisofi et al. 2020, Sheyhakinia et al. 2020). Different activities of antioxidant enzymes in response to Tre under salt stress have been reported in various plants. Tre treatment decreased the activity of peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase enzymes in rice under salt stress (Rohman et al. 2019). In another study, the treatment of Chenopodium quinoa with Tre under salt stress increased the activity of APX, catalase and superoxide dismutase enzymes (Abdallah et al. 2020). In addition, an increase in the activity of ­antioxidant enzymes has been observed with Tre treatment under different stress conditions (Zhao et al. 2019, Liu et al. 2020). However, in all these studies, Tre-treated plants showed tolerance to salt stress, which can indicate the existence of different strategies in plants to cope with salinity in the presence of Tre. In contrast, our results showed that the changes in enzyme activity patterns induced by Tre treatment do not indicate increased tolerance to salt stress, because these patterns are not correlated with other indicators showing stress reduction.

Conclusion

The results of this study show that salt stress without change in SWC decreases growth characteristics, photosynthetic pigments, and starch content, but increases the activity of ROS-scavenging enzymes and the accumulation of metabolites including soluble sugars, proteins, free amino acids, and proline. Tre treatment not only does not reduce the adverse effects of salinity but even causes more severe inhibition of plant growth, further reduction of photosynthetic pigments and soluble proteins along with the excessive accumulation of free amino acids and proline. Therefore, Tre treatment is not effective in salinity tolerance of basil seedlings and reduces their growth possibly through diverting carbon to other metabolic pathways rather than growth processes. However, due to the effect of Tre on the change in carbon partitioning, the role of this molecule in various metabolic and physiological pathways is obvious, the detailed understanding of which requires further research on the physiological effects of Tre under stress and non-stress conditions.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Deputy of Research at the University of Sistan and Baluchestan for financial support in the form of grants for the MSc research project.

Funding

This work was funded by the Deputy of Research at the University of Sistan and Baluchestan in the form of a grant for M.Sc. research project.

Author contribution statement

R. Karamzehi carried out all the laboratory research. A. Einali designed the experiment, provided all the technical support during the laboratory work, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the submitted manuscript.

References

Abdallah, M. M. S., El Sebai, T. N., Ramadan, A. A. E. M., ­El-Bassiouny, H. M. S., 2020: Physiological and biochemical role of proline, trehalose, and compost on enhancing salinity tolerance of quinoa plant. Bulletin of the National Research Centre 44, 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00354-4

Abdallah, M. S., Abdelgawad, Z. A., El-Bassiouny, H. M. S., 2016: Alleviation of the adverse effects of salinity stress using ­trehalose in two rice varieties. South African Journal of ­Botany 103, 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.019

Afify, A. E. M. M., El-Beltagi, H. S., Abd El-Salam, S. M., Omran, A. A., 2012: Protein solubility, digestibility and fractionation after germination of sorghum varieties. Plos one 7, e31154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031154

Agong, S. G., Yoshida, Y., Yazawa, S., Masuda, M., 2004: Tomato response to salt stress. In: XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Advances in Vegetable Breeding, International ­Society for Horticultural Science. Acta Horticulturae 637, ­93–97. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.637.10

Ahammed, G. J., Li, Y., Li, X., Han, W. Y., Chen, S., 2018: Epigallo­catechin-3-gallate alleviates salinity-retarded seed germination and oxidative stress in tomato. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 37, 1349–1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9849-0

Ahmad, P., Alyemeni, M. N., Abass Ahanger, M., Wijaya, L., Alam, P., Kumar, A., Ashraf, M., 2018: Upregulation of ­antioxidant and glyoxalase systems mitigates NaCl stress in Brassica juncea by supplementation of zinc and calcium. Journal of Plant Interactions 13(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2018.1441452

Ahmad, P., Jhon, R., 2005: Effect of salt stress on growth and biochemical parameters of Pisum sativum L. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 51(6), 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340500274151

Ali, M., Kamran, M., Abbasi, G. H., Saleem, M. H., Ahmad, S., Parveen, A., Fahad, S., 2021: Melatonin-induced salinity tolerance by ameliorating osmotic and oxidative stress in the seedlings of two tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivars. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 40, 2236–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10273-3

Ali, Q., Ashraf, M., 2011: Induction of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) due to exogenous application of trehalose: growth, photosynthesis, water relations and oxidative defence mechanism. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197(4), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00463.x

Alisofi, S., Einali, A., Sangtarash, M. H., 2020: Jasmonic acid-induced metabolic responses in bitter melon (Momordica charantia) seedlings under salt stress. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 95(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2019.1663135

Arnon, D., 1949: Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1

Bahcesular, B., Yildirim, E.D., Karaçocuk, M., Kulak, M., Karaman, S., 2020: Seed priming with melatonin effects on growth, essential oil compounds and antioxidant activity of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under salinity stress. Industrial Crops and Products 146, 112165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112165

Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., Teare, I. D., 1973: Rapid determination of free Proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil 39, 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060

Bernstein, N., Kafkafi, U., 2002: Root growth under salinity stress. In: Plant Roots (Eds. Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., Beeckman, T., Kafkafi, U.,) 1222-1250. CRC Press.

Bradford, M. M., 1976: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72(1–2), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

Brodmann, D., Schuller, A., Ludwig-Müller, J., Aeschbacher, R.A., Wiemken, A., Boller, T., Wingler, A., 2002: Induction of ­trehalase in Arabidopsis plants infected with the trehalose producing pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 15(7), 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.7.693

Caliskan, O., Kurt, D., Temizel, K. E., Odabas, M. S., 2017: Effect of salt stress and irrigation water on growth and development of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Open Agriculture 2(1), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0062

Chang, B., Yang, L., Cong, W., Zu, Y., Tang, Z., 2014: The improved resistance to high salinity induced by trehalose is associated with ionic regulation and osmotic adjustment in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 77, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.02.001

Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., Pinheiro, C., 2009: Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of botany 103(4), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn125

Chen, G. X., Asada, K., 1992: Inactivation of ascorbate peroxidase by thiols requires hydrogen peroxide. Plant and cell physiology 33(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078229

Chen, H., Jiang, J. G., 2010: Osmotic adjustment and plant adaptation to environmental changes related to drought and salinity. Environmental Reviews 18, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1139/A10-014

Claussen, W., 2005: Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Science 168, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.039

Colin, L., Ruhnow, F., Zhu, J. K., Zhao, C., Zhao, Y., Persson, S., 2023: The cell biology of primary cell walls during salt stress. Plant Cell 35(1), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac292

De Costa, W., Zörb, C., Hartung, W., Schubert, S., 2007: Salt resistance is determined by osmotic adjustment and abscisic acid in newly developed maize hybrids in the first phase of salt stress. Physiologia Plantarum 131(2), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00962.x

Ebert, S., Gibis, M., Terjung, N., Weiss, J., 2020: Survey of aqueous solubility, appearance, and pH of plant protein powders from carbohydrate and vegetable oil production. LWT- Food Science and Technology 133, 110078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110078

Einali, A., Valizadeh, J., 2017: Storage reserve mobilization, gluconeogenesis, and oxidative pattern in dormant pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) seeds during cold stratification. Trees 31, 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1498-y

Farouk, S., Omar, M.M., 2020: Sweet basil growth, physiological and ultrastructural modification, and oxidative defense system under water deficit and silicon forms treatment. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 39, 1307–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10071-x

Gao, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., Zheng, L., Borjigin, T., Wang, Y., 2022: Nitric oxide alleviates salt-induced stress damage by regulating the ascorbate–glutathione cycle and Na+/K+ homeostasis in Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 173, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.017

Gunes, A., Anal, A., Alpaslan, M., Eraslan, F., Bagci, E. G., Cick, N., 2007: Salicylic acid induced changes on some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress and mineral nutration in maize (Zea mays L.) grown under salinity. Journal of Plant Physiology 164(6), 728–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.12.009

Handel, E.V., 1968: Direct microdetermination of sucrose. Analytical Biochemistry 22(2), 280–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0003-2697(68)90317-5

He, M., He, C.Q., Ding, N.Z., 2018: Abiotic stresses: general defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 1771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01771

Henschel, J. M., de Moura, V. S., Silva, A. M. O., Gomes, D. D. S., dos Santos, S. K., Batista, D. S., Dias, T. J., 2023: Can exogenous methyl jasmonate mitigate salt stress in radish plants? Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology 35, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-023-00270-8

Imada, S., Matsuo, N., Acharya, K., Yamanaka, N., 2015: Effects of salinity on fine root distribution and whole plant biomass of Tamarix ramosissima cuttings. Journal of Arid Environments 114, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014. 11.011

Imada, S., Yamanaka, N., Tamai, S., 2008: Water table depth ­affects Populus alba fine root growth and whole plant ­biomass. Functional Ecology 22(6), 1018–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01454.x

Islam, S., Mohammad, F., 2021: Modulation of growth, photosynthetic efficiency, leaf biochemistry, cell viability and yield of Indian mustard by the application of trehalose. Scientia ­Horticulturae 290, 110527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110527

Islam, S., Mohammad, F., Siddiqui, M. H., Kalaji, H. M., 2023: Salicylic acid and trehalose attenuate salt toxicity in Brassica juncea L. by activating the stress defense mechanism. Environmental Pollution 326, 121467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121467

Kaur, H., Hussain, S.J., Kaur, G., Poor, P., Alamri, S., Siddiqui, M.H., Khan, M.I.R., 2022: Salicylic Acid Improves Nitrogen Fixation, Growth, Yield and Antioxidant Defence Mechanisms in Chickpea Genotypes Under Salt Stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 41, 2034–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10592-7

Khadri, M., Tejera, N.A., Lluch, C., 2006: Alleviation of salt stress in common bean by exogenous abscisic acid supply. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 25, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-005-0004-3

Khan, T.A., Saleem, M., Fariduddin, Q., 2023: Melatonin influences stomatal behavior, root morphology, cell viability, ­photosynthetic responses, fruit yield, and fruit quality of ­tomato plants exposed to salt stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 42, 2408–2432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10713-2

Kolbe, A., Tiessen, A., Schluepmann, H., Paul, M., Ulrich, S., ­Geigenberger, P., 2005: Trehalose 6-phosphate regulates starch synthesis via posttranslational redox activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(31), 11118–11123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503410102

Kosar, F., Akram, NA., Sadiq, M., Al-Qurainy, F., Ashraf, M., 2019: Trehalose: a key organic osmolyte effectively involved in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Journal of Plant Growth ­Regulation 38, 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9876-x

Kumari, M., Asthir, B., 2016: Transformation of sucrose to starch and protein in rice leaves and grains under two establishment methods. Rice Science 23(5), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.rsci.2016.08.003

Kwee, E.M., Niemeyer, E.D., 2011: Variations in phenolic composition and antioxidant properties among 15 basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars. Food Chemistry 128(4), 1044–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.011

Lichtenthaler, H.K., Buschmann, C., 2001: Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry F4.3.1– F4.3.8. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01

Liu, T., Ye, X., Li, M., Li, J., Qi, H., Hu, X., 2020: H2O2 and NO are involved in trehalose-regulated oxidative stress tolerance in cold-stressed tomato plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 171, 103961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103961

Lunn, J.E., Delorge, I., Figueroa, C.M., Van Dijck, P., Stitt, M., 2014: Trehalose metabolism in plants. The Plant Journal 79(4), 544–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12509

Luo, Y., Li, F., Wang, G.P., Yang, X.H., Wang, W., 2010: Exogenous supplied trehalose protects thylakoid membranes of winter wheat from heat-induced damage. Biologia Plantarum 54, 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0087-y

Ma, J., Zhu, X., Shi, L., Ni, C., Hou, J., Cheng, J., 2019: Enhancement of soluble protein, polypeptide production and functional properties of heat-denatured soybean meal by fermentation of Monascus purpureus 04093. CyTA-Journal of Food 17(1), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2019.1695677

Markwell, M.A.K., Hass, S.M., Tolbert N.E., Bieber, L.L., 1981: Protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples: manual and automated procedures. Methods in Enzymology 72, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(81)72018-4

McCarthy, M. C., Enquist, B. J., 2007: Consistency between an ­allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Functional Ecology 21(4), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007. 01276.x

McCready, R.M., Guggolz, J., Silviera, V., Owens, H.S., 1950: ­Determination of starch and amylose in vegetables. Analy­tical Chemistry 22, 1156–1158. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60045a016

Metwally, A., Finkemeier, I., Georgi, M., Dietz, K. J., 2003: ­Salicylic acid alleviates the cadmium toxicity in barley seedlings. Plant physiology 132(1), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.018457

Miller, G.L., 1959: Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Analytical Chemistry 31, 426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030

Mishra, A., Mandoli, A., Jha, B., 2008: Physiological characterization and stress-induced metabolic responses of Dunaliella salina isolated from salt pan. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 35(10), 1093–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0387-9

Misra, N., Saxena, P., 2009: Effect of salicylic acid on proline metabolism in lentil grown under salinity stress. Plant Science 177(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.05.007

Mostofa, M.G., Hossain, M.A., Fujita, M., 2015: Trehalose pretreatment induces salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings: oxidative damage and co-induction of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Protoplasma 252, 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0691-3

Mostofa, M.G., Seraj, Z.I., Fujita, M., 2014: Exogenous sodium nitroprusside and glutathione alleviate copper toxicity by reducing copper uptake and oxidative damage in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Protoplasma 251, 1373–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0639-7

Muller, J., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., 1998: Trehalose affects sucrose synthase and invertase activities in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) roots. Journal of Plant Physiology 153(1–2), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(98)80078-3

Muller, J., Wiemken, A., Aeschbacher, R., 1999: Trehalose ­metabolism in sugar sensing and plant development. Plant Science 147(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99) 00094-1

Nakano, Y., Asada, K., 1981: Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and cell physiology 22(5), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232

Nakashima, K., Ito, Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., 2009: Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiology 149(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.129791

Nakayama, H., Horie, T., Yonamine, I., Shinmyo, A., Yoshida, K., 2005: Improving salt tolerance in plant cells. Plant Biotechnology 22(5), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.22.477

Nounjan, N., Nghia, P.T., Theerakulpisut, P., 2012: Exogenous proline and trehalose promote recovery of rice seedlings from salt-stress and differentially modulate antioxidant enzymes and expression of related genes. Journal of Plant Physiology 169(6), 596–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2012.01.004

Nunes, C., Schluepmann, H., Delatte, T.L., Wingler, A., Silva, A.B., Fevereiro, P.S., Jansen, M., Fiorani, F., Wiese-Klinkenberg, A., Paul, M.J., 2013: Regulation of growth by the trehalose pathway: relationship to temperature and sucrose. Plant signaling & behavior 8(12), e26626. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.26626

O’Hara, L. E., Paul, M. J., Wingler, A., 2013: How do sugars regulate plant growth and development? New insight into the role of trehalose-6-phosphate. Molecular Plant 6(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss120

Panjekobi, M., Einali, A., 2021: Trehalose treatment alters carbon partitioning and reduces the accumulation of individual metabolites but does not affect salt tolerance in the green microalga Dunaliella bardawil. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 27, 2333–2344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-021-01078-z

Peng, X., Wang, N., Sun, S., Geng, L., Guo, N., Liu, A., Chen, S., Ahammed, G.J., 2023: Reactive oxygen species signaling is involved in melatonin-induced reduction of chlorothalonil residue in tomato leaves. Journal of Hazardous Materials 443(A), 130212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130212

Porra, R.J., Schafer, W., Cmiel, E., Katheder, I., Scheer, H., 1994: The derivation of the formyl-group oxygen of chlorophyll b in higher plants from molecular oxygen. Achievement of high enrichment of the 7-formyl-group oxygen from 18O2 in greening maize leaves. European Journal of Biochemistry 219(1–2), 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb19983.x

Qiu, Z., Guo, J., Zhu, A., Zhang, L., Zhang, M., 2014: Exogenous jasmonic acid can enhance tolerance of wheat seedlings to salt stress. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 104, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.014

Reignault, P., Cogan, A., Muchembled, J., Sahraoui, A.L.H., Durand, R., Sancholle, M., 2001: Trehalose induces resistance to powdery mildew in wheat. New Phytologist 149(3), 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00035.x

Renard-Merlier, D., Randoux, B., Nowak, E., Farcy, F., Durnad, R., Reignault, P., 2007: Iodus 40, salicylic acid, heptanoyl salicylic acid and trehalose exhibit different efficacies and defense targets during wheat/powdery mildew infection. Phytochemistry 68(8), 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.02.011

Rohman, M. M., Islam, M. R., Monsur, M. B., Amiruzzaman, M., Fujita, M., Hasanuzzaman, M., 2019: Trehalose protects maize plants from salt stress and phosphorus deficiency. Plants 8(12), 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8120568

Sadak, M. S., 2019: Physiological role of trehalose on enhancing salinity tolerance of wheat plant. Bulletin of the National ­Research Centre 43, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0098-6

Scagel, C.F., Lee, J., Mitchell, J.N., 2019: Salinity from NaCl changes the nutrient and polyphenolic composition of basil leaves. Industrial Crops and Products 127, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.048

Schluepmann, H., van Dijken, A., Aghdasi, M., Wobbes, B., Paul, M., Smeekens, S., 2004: Trehalose mediated growth inhibition of Arabidopsis seedlings is due to trehalose-6-phosphate ­accumulation. Plant Physiology 135(2), 879–890. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.039503

Sheyhakinia, S., Bamary, Z., Einali, A., Valizadeh, J., 2020: The induction of salt stress tolerance by jasmonic acid treatment in roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seedlings through enhancing antioxidant enzymes activity and metabolic changes. ­Biologia 75, 681–692. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00444-8

Singh, M., Kumar, J., Singh, S., Singh, V.P., Prasad, S.M., 2015: Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 14, 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9372-8

Stark, D. M., Timmerman, K. P., Barry, G. F., Preiss, J., Kishore, G. M., 1992: Regulation of the amount of starch in plant tissues by ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase. Science 258(5080), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.258.5080.287

Stone, S.L., Gifford, D.J., 1997: Structural and biochemical changes in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seeds during germination and early seedling growth: I. Storage protein reserves. International Journal of Plant Science 158(6), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1086/297484

Theerakulpisut, P., Phongngarm, S., 2013: Alleviation of adverse effects of salt stress on rice seedlings by exogenous trehalose. Asian Journal of Crop Science 5(4), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2013.405.415

Türkan, I., Demiral, T., 2009: Recent developments in understanding salinity tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany 67(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009. 05.008

Veluthambi, K., Mahadevan, S., Maheshwari, R., 1981: Trehalose toxicity in Cuscuta reflexa: correlation with low trehalase activity. Plant Physiology 68(6), 1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.68.6.1369

Veluthambi, K., Mahadevan, S., Maheshwari, R., 1982a: Trehalose toxicity in Cuscuta reflexa: cell wall synthesis is inhibited upon trehalose feeding. Plant Physiology 70(3), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.70.3.686

Veluthambi, K., Mahadevan, S., Maheshwari, R., 1982b: Trehalose toxicity in Cuscuta reflexa: sucrose content decreases in shoot tips upon trehalose feeding. Plant Physiology 69(6), 1247–1251. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.69.6.1247

Wingler, A., Fritzius, T., Wiemken, A., Boller, T., Aeschbacher, R. A., 2000: Trehalose induces the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase gene, ApL3, and starch synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant physiology 124(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.1.105

Yemm, E.W., Cocking, E.C., 1955: The determination of amino-acids with ninhydrin. Analyst 80, 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9558000209

Yin, Y‐G., Kobayashi, Y., Sanuki, A., Kondo, S., Fukuda, N., Ezura, H., Sugaya. S., Matsukura, C., 2010: Salinity induces carbohydrate accumulation and sugar‐regulated starch biosynthetic genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. ‘Micro‐Tom’) fruits in an ABA‐ and osmotic stress‐independent manner. Journal of Experimental Botany 61(2), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp333

Yoon, J.Y., Hamayun, M., Lee, S.K., Lee, I.J., 2009: Methyl jasmonate alleviated salinity stress in soybean. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 12, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-009-0060-5

Zhang, J.L., Shi, H., 2013: Physiological and molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance. Photosynthesis Research 115,1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9813-6

Zhang, X., Wu, N., Li, C., 2005: Physiological and growth responses of Populus davidiana ecotypes to different soil water contents. Journal of Arid environments 60(4), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.07.008

Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Wen, W., Shi, Z., Gu, Q., Ahammed, G.J., Guo, S., 2021: Hydrogen peroxide mediates spermidine-induced autophagy to alleviate salt stress in cucumber. Autophagy 17(10), 2876–2890. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2020.1847797

Zhao, D.Q., Li, T.T., Hao, Z.J., Cheng, M.L., Tao, J., 2019: Exogenous trehalose confers high temperature stress tolerance to herbaceous peony by enhancing antioxidant systems, activating photosynthesis, and protecting cell structure. Cell Stress and Chaperones 24(1), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-018-00961-1

Zhao, S., Zhang, Q., Liu, M., Zhou, H., Ma, C., Wang, P., 2021: Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22(9), 4609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094609